Madeleine Moon MP
Big payout is criticised
Welcome
*Gordon Brown's New Cabinet*
The role of an MP
About Bridgend
Surgeries
E-surgery *new*
Your Views - New Deal for Carers Consultation
SMACKING: Laws to be reviewed
Climate Change *new*
In The Media
Press Releases
My speeches in the House
My Latest News & Articles from Parliament
My contact details
Useful links
Local Campaigns
About Us

By Abby Alford South Wales Echo
364  words
13 March 2007
South Wales Echo
(c) Western Mail and Echo Ltd, 2007.

Auditors called in to investigate a massive golden handshake given to a failing council chief have rebuked the local authority.

But the independent investigation into the £365,000 pay-off to Bridgend's former chief executive Keri Lewis said the payment WAS lawful.

Bridgend MP  Madeleine Moon , who has previously expressed her anger over Mr Lewis' departure, said today: 'The auditors may find the decision legal but local people will view it as inept.' Authority is rebuked on its timing: A golden handshake given to a council chief guilty of 'misconduct' over an election scandal WAS lawful.

But auditors called in to investigate the £365,000 retirement package for Bridgend's former chief Keri Lewis issued a stern rebuke to the local authority.

They concluded the cash should not have been handed over until an investigation into his role in the electoral services controversy was complete.

Mr Lewis had been responsible for election officials Janet Wile and Delyth Lucas, who were sacked for major counting errors in three elections and for falsely claiming more than £50,000 in expenses.

After Mr Lewis retired, an external independent investigation by Tim Kerr QC concluded 'shortcomings' in his performance amounted to 'misconduct'.

But he also said Mr Lewis had not known about the unlawful payments Mrs Wile and Mrs Lucas made to themselves.

The report compiled by Bridgend council's auditors KPMG after complaints from disgruntled residents has also revealed:

There was no up-to-date appraisal of Keri Lewis' performance

That councillors were not given all the options, specifically one of dismissal, prior to agreeing to Mr Lewis' departure

That some members believed the package was 'take it or leave it'.

But the auditors found there was no recorded evidence of under-performance by Mr Lewis and the risk of having to pay significant sums under an industrial tribunal meant there was no option available to dismiss him for capability reasons.

In the report, the auditors make recommendations for the council to improve their management and appraisal processes.

A council spokesman said: 'We welcome this report and we have taken all the recommendations on board.'

Enter supporting content here